{"id":196,"date":"2019-04-08T05:07:33","date_gmt":"2019-04-08T05:07:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.huronresearch.ca\/eng2\/?page_id=196"},"modified":"2019-04-09T12:33:17","modified_gmt":"2019-04-09T12:33:17","slug":"1817-ed-rime-of-the-ancient-mariner-w-glosses","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.huronresearch.ca\/eng2\/texts\/1817-ed-rime-of-the-ancient-mariner-w-glosses\/","title":{"rendered":"1817 \u2219 Rime of the Ancient Mariner with added Glosses"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n

The\u00a0Sibylline Leaves<\/em> edition of the poem both incorporated previously noted changes from the 1798, 1800, 1802, and 1805 editions and new ones, exclusive to this edition. These alterations were largely aesthetic, such as the widely-suggested removal of “archaic”\u00a0medieval language–note the absence of the ‘y’ in\u00a0“ancyent”\u00a0<\/em>and the dropped e from\u00a0“Marinere,”\u00a0<\/em>but the edition also “dropped some sixty lines and added another twenty,” though not necessarily as replacements\u00a0(Coleridge and Textual Instability\u00a0<\/em>60). In addition to typographical and grammatical fixes, some line drops, and added lines, Coleridge added the hotly debated\u00a0marginal glos<\/strong>s<\/strong> in 1817. Viewable below are the changes made to the text between the 1798 and 1817 editions, overlaid upon a facsimile edition of the 1798\u00a0Lyrical Ballads, with a Few other Poems\u00a0<\/em>edition.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

For an independent reading of the marginal gloss, click here<\/a>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\n

\u2022<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
<\/div>\r\n
\r\n
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div>
<\/div> <\/div>\r\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The\u00a0Sibylline Leaves edition of the poem both incorporated previously noted changes from the 1798, 1800, 1802, and 1805 editions and new ones, exclusive to this edition. These alterations were largely aesthetic, such as the widely-suggested removal of “archaic”\u00a0medieval language–note the absence of the ‘y’ in\u00a0“ancyent”\u00a0and the dropped e from\u00a0“Marinere,”\u00a0but the edition also “dropped some sixty […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":231,"parent":166,"menu_order":2,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_mc_calendar":[],"footnotes":"","_links_to":"","_links_to_target":""},"class_list":["post-196","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","czr-hentry"],"aioseo_notices":[],"aioseo_head":"\n\t\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t